Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ATMA SINGHA & ORS versus STATE OF PUNJAB.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Atma Singha & Ors v. State of Punjab. - CRM-45423-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4637 (24 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.Misc.No.45423-M of 2006

Atma Singha and others Vs. State of Punjab.

Present : Mr.R.S. Rangpuri, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that a perusal of the FIR reveals that no offence, whatsoever, is made out under Sections 2,3 and 4 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act'). The complainant has filed similar complaints earlier also, against one of the accused. It is contended that the use of the words attributed to the petitioners do not make out an offence under the aforementioned Act.

Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab, for 21.8.2006.

Mr.B.S. Baath, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, on the asking of the Court, accepts notice and prays for time to seek instructions.

In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioners shall remain stayed.

Process dasti only.

3.8.2006 ( RAJIVE BHALLA )

GS JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.