Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PUSHPA KAPPAL versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Pushpa Kappal v. Union of India & Ors - CWP-5889-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4688 (24 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5889 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: JULY 27, 2006

Parties Name

Pushpa Kappal

..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Union of India and others

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL

PRESENT: Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Adv., for Mr. Sukant Prabhakar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. R.S. Bhatia, Advocate,

for respondent No. 3.

JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral)

Order.

Reply on behalf of respondent No. 3 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. Copy supplied to the counsel opposite.

During arguments, it has transpired that against the impugned order, appeal lies. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner states that he be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appeal against the order under challenge. He further prays that as the petitioner was pursuing remedy before this Court, objection regarding limitation be not raised.

After hearing counsel for the parties, this Court feels that the prayer made is justified. As the Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal has joined and the said Tribunal is functioning, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal against the order under challenge. Shri Bhatia states that if any such appeal is filed within fifteen days from today, the respondent shall not raise any objection regarding limitation. It is further ordered that for the next fifteen days, interim order passed by this Court on April 19, 2006, shall remain in existence. In the meantime, petitioner may, if so advised, move an application for interim stay before the Tribunal, which shall be decided by it as per law.

( Jasbir Singh )

Judge

( Pritam Pal )

July 27, 2006. Judge

DKC


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.