Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KELO DEVI versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kelo Devi v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-12112-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4715 (24 July 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 12112 of 2006

Date of Decision: 4.8.2006

Kelo Devi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. Sameer Sachdev, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

Order dated 31.3.1999 (P-1) passed by appointing authority and order dated 21.11.2002 (P-2) passed by the Appellate Authority, are the subject matter of challenge in the instant petition.

It is well settled that the limitation period prescribed for filing a suit C.W.P. No. 12085 of 2006

shall be deemed to be the period for filing a writ petition, as has been held by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of State of M.P. v.

Bhailal Bhai, AIR 1964 SC 1006. Therefore, the instant writ petition is barred by time.

Dismissed.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

August 4, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.