Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

WAZIR SINGH & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


WAZIR SINGH & Ors v. STATE OF HARYANA - CWP-1064-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 4789 (25 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CASE NO.: CWP No.1064 of 2005

DATE OF DECISION: July 28, 2006

WAZIR SINGH AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NIRMAL YADAV.

Present: M.L. SARIN, SR. ADVOCATE

WITH MR.NARENDER HOODA, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS.

MR. H.S. HOODA, ADVOCATE GENERAL, HARYANA WITH MR. ASHISH KAPOOR, ADL.A.G., HARYANA.

MR. RAJESH LAMBA, ADVOCATE FOR M.C., ROHTAK.

MR. ARUN WALIA, ADVOCATE WITH

MR. AJAY NARA, ADVOCATE FOR HUDA.

MS. RAMINDER GADHOKE, ADVOCATE

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (ORAL)

This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.18792, 18927, 19141, 19200, 19201, 19210, 19288, 19310, 19315, 19385, 19432, 19446, 19533, 19545, 19546, 19554, 19674, 19687, 19802, 19828, 19829, 19919, 19969, 19981, 20016, 20098, 20156, 20177, 20227, 20231, 20233, 20245, 20340, 20363, 20365, 20368, 20369, 20371 of 2004, CWP Nos.18, 38, 80, 111, 118, 120, 202, 211, of 2005, CWP Nos.19978, 20364, 20374 of 2004, CWP Nos.1964, 560, 270 of 2005 and CWP No.20174 of 2004 (O&M).

The petitioners have prayed for quashing the notification under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act for acquisition of land in the revenue estate of village Bohar Hadbast No.74 and village Pada, Hadbast No.67, district Rohtak.

Mr. H.S. Hooda, learned Advocate General, Haryana states that the State Government has considered the matter regarding the acquisition of land of the petitioners and after a conscious decision, has decided to release the land of the petitioners.

In view of the fact that the land of the petitioners have been released from acquisition, therefore the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such.

(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)

JUDGE

July 28, 2006 (NIRMAL YADAV)

Gulati JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.