High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
Kalyan Singh v. Gian Singh - COCP-1113-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 4817 (27 July 2006)
COCP No.1113 of 2005
Date of decision: August 4, 2006.
Kalyan Singh
...Petitioner(s)
v.
Gian Singh & Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Present: None for the Petitioner.
Shri G.S. Cheema, Sr. Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
The petitioner filed CWP No.4799 of 2005 for the grant of certain benefits, which was disposed of on 28.3.2005 with a direction to the District Education Officer (Secondary), Patiala to take a final decision on the representation which the petitioner had already made.
Though in compliance to the aforesaid order, the petitioner's claims have been considered by the District Education Officer(SE), Patiala, who passed the order dated 18.7.2005 (Annexure P-3) accepting most of his claims, however, alleging that the consequential benefits were not being paid to him, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition.
In response to the show cause, Smt. Pritpal Kaur Sidhu, DEO (SE), Patiala respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit in which it is averred that consequential arrears, except that of ACP, have been paid to the petitioner by way of a bank draft dated 13.12.2005 which he declined to accept. Shri Cheema, Learned State Counsel, on instructions from Ashwani Kumar, LO, however, states that the petitioner has now accepted the payment of arrears on 25.4.2006.
Having regard to the fact that the petitioner's claims have been considered and disposed of by the respondents in terms of the directions issued by this Court and arrears have also been paid to him, no further action is required to be taken in these proceedings which are accordingly dropped, with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the speaking order and/or a part thereof, if so advised.
Disposed of.
Rule discharged.
August 04, 2006. [ Surya Kant ]
kadyan Judge
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.