High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Jai Parkash v. Haryana Urban Development Authority - CWP-652-2005  RD-P&H 4849 (27 July 2006)
CWP NO.652 of 2005
DATE OF DECISION:July 24,2006
Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SARON
PRESENT: Shri Atul Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Raman Gaur, Advocate for the respondents.
The petitioner claims that he had remained successful in the draw of lots and his name had appeared at Sr.No.189 in the list of the applicants who were successful. However, his grievance is that even after having remained successful, the respondents have not issued him an allotment letter qua any plot.
The claim of the petitioner has been denied by the respondents. In their written statement filed by respondent No.3, the factum of the petitioner having ever remained successful in the draw of lots has been denied. Respondent No.3 has also denied the list of successful candidates (Annexure P.1).
In view of the divergence pleas raised by the parties, we find that the disputed questions of fact arise for determination which cannot be determined for want of evidence.
Consequently, we relegate the petitioner to seek his appropriate remedies before the Civil Court, if so advised.
Disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
July 24,2006 (S.S. Saron)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.