Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AMARJIT KAUR ALIAS BINDRI versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


AMARJIT KAUR ALIAS BINDRI v. STATE OF PUNJAB - CRM-69097-M-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 487 (2 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 69097-M OF 2005

DATE OF DECISION: 21.2.2006

AMARJIT KAUR ALIAS BINDRI

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB

...RESPONDENT

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Sanjiv Pandey, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Ms Reeta Kohli, DAG, Punjab.

-----

ORDER:

The petitioner is in custody for more than two years.

Counsel for the State says that the case is fixed for evidence on 23.3.2006 and in fact, one witness has already been examined.

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, no case is made out for grant of bail at this stage, but the trial court is directed to expedite the recording of evidence having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already been in custody for more than two years and conclude the trial, as far as possible, within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

The petition is dismissed.

February 21, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.