Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUNIL KUMAR versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sunil Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors - CWP-11416-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4916 (27 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.11416 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:July 27, 2006

Sunil Kumar

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Union Territory, Chandigarh and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL

PRESENT: Shri P.M.Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are satisfied that the petitioner has raised disputed questions of fact which cannot be determined by this Court, for want of evidence.

Consequently, we relegate the petitioner to seek his appropriate remedies before the Civil Court, if so advised.

Disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

July 27, 2006 (A.N. Jindal)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.