Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHAN LAL versus THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohan Lal v. The Punjab State Cooperative Supply - CWP-12654-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4967 (28 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.12654 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: August 11, 2006

Mohan Lal

....Petitioner

VERSUS

The Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited and another

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions against the respondents to make a payment to the petitioner as per the clause 12 of the agreement for the work of 6 export specials claim to have been done on behalf of the respondents.

From the perusal of the record, we find that a representation dated May 16, 2005 (Annexure P.4) has been filed by the petitioner claiming the relief which has been claimed in the present petition. The said representation remains unreasoned so far.

Consequently, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the District Manager, MARKFED, Patiala, respondent No.2 to take a final decision upon the aforesaid representation within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

August 11, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.