Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GRAM PANCHAYAT VILL.RASULPUR versus DIDAR SINGH

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gram Panchayat Vill.Rasulpur v. Didar Singh - CR-237-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 5020 (31 July 2006)

C.R. No.237 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.R. No.237 of 2006

Date of Decision:- 10.08.2006.

Gram Panchayat Vill.Rasulpur ....Petitioner through

Mr.J.S.Bandohal, Advocate.

vs.

Didar Singh ....Respondent

through

None.

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
***

SURYA KANT, J.

This revision petition has been preferred by the Gram Panchayat of Village Rasulpur, challenging the orders passed by the Courts below whereby upon an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the respondent-plaintiff, a direction to maintain status-quo has been issued.

The dispute pertains to the property which at one point of time was a "well" used for fetching drinking water by the inhabitants. Even if it is proved that the suit property is 'Shamlat' property and is vested in the Gram Panchayat, it is a debatable issue as to why not the inhabitants of village Rasulpur can still use the same for common purposes? In this view of the matter, the respondent-plaintiff has been C.R. No.237 of 2006 2

able to make out a prima facie case in his favour.

As it appears from the impugned order, the subject property has been used for 'common purposes' for a sufficient long period, therefore, apprehension of irreparable loss and injury also tilts in favour of the respondent-plaintiff. Similar would be the position of balance of convenience.

In this view of the matter, even if this Court forms a second opinion, it cannot be substituted in place of the one formed by the Courts below. Consequently, I do not find any merit in this revision petition which is accordingly dismissed.

August 10, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.