Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AJAY SYAL versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ajay Syal v. Union of India & Ors - CWP-12389-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 5038 (31 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No. 12389 of 2006

Date of Decision: 10.08.2006

Ajay Syal

Petitioners

versus

Union of India and others

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL

Present: Shri A.S.Narang, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)

This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent No.2, to investigate the affairs of respondent No.3 with particular reference to the accounts of respondent No.4. It has further been prayed that if upon investigation, any act of fraud committed by respondent No.3 stands established, action be taken as per provisions of Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

It is an admitted fact that before filing of this writ petition, the petitioner has not approached respondent No.2. To claim writ of mandamus, it is necessary for any person to first approach the authority concerned and only thereafter, he may approach this Court, if no action has been taken. So far as proceedings under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 are concerned, against action taken, appeal is CWP No. 12389 of 2006 - 2 -

competent. As per information supplied, the appeal was, in fact, filed by the Company- respondent No.4, the same was dismissed in default and application, to recall that order is still pending. No case is made out for interference.

Dismissed.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner, to approach Reserve Bank of India for necessary relief and if any such representation is made, the same be disposed of very expeditiously.

( Jasbir Singh )

Judge

August 10, 2006 ( Pritam Pal )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.