Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RULDU RAM versus B.R.BAJAJ AND ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ruldu Ram v. B.R.Bajaj and Ors. - COCP-1292-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 5127 (2 August 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.O.C.P. No.1292 of 2004

Date of Decision:- 21.08.2006

Ruldu Ram ....Petitioner

through

Mr.D.D.Bansal, Advocate

vs.

B.R.Bajaj and ors. ....Respondents

through

Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab

Mr.A.R.Takkar, Advocate

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
***

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner filed C.W.P.No.2998 of 2004 which was disposed of on May 13, 2004 with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the legal notice, which he had already served, within a period of two months. It was also directed that "in the event, the request made by the petitioner is accepted by the respondents, necessary relief be granted to him within a period of one month thereafter." There is no denial to the fact that in order to comply with the above-mentioned directions, firstly a Committee consisting of three office bearers of the Municipal Council was constituted vide order dated 26.7.2004 (Annexure P-4) to look into various claimes put-forth by the petitioner who had allegedly executed certain works for the Municipal Council.

On the re-commendations of the said Committee, it is alleged that the Municipal Council has now turned down the petitioner's claim as contained in the legal notice, which was directed by this Court to be considered and disposed of.

Both the parties have filed claims and counter-claims in their favour.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the scope of interference in these proceedings and to adjudicate the issues, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his claim for the alleged recoveries before an appropriate forum, if so advised.

Rule stands discharged.

August 21, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.