Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT.MAIL KAURI versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt.Mail Kauri v. Food Corporation of India & Anr - CWP-10692-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 5160 (3 August 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.10692 OF 2005

DATE OF DECISION: 03.08.2006

Smt.Mail Kauri ..Petitioner

Versus

Food Corporation of India and another ....Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRAN ANAND LALL

PRESENT: Mr.Raman Sharma, Advocate

for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr. C.R. Dahiya, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition at the motion stage.

Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the controversy in hand is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Pargat Singh V. Food Corporation of India and another (CWP No.5459 of 2004 decided on 3.8.2006).

Dismissed in view of the order passed in Pargat Singh's case (supra).

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( Kiran Anand Lall )

August 03, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.