High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam v. Sohan Lal & Ors - RSA-52-2005  RD-P&H 533 (3 February 2006)
Case No. : R.S.A.No.52 of 2005
Date of Decision : January 24, 2006.
Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Limiated, Panchkula & others .... Appellants Vs.
Sohan Lal and others .... Respondents
Coram : Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal.
* * *
Present : Mr.Alok Jain, Advocate
for the appellants.
for the respondents.
The defendant-Nigam and others having concurrently lost before the two courts below, have approached this Court through the present appeal.
The two courts below have taken into consideration that although the plaintiff-respondents had been appointed on temporary basis but their services were continued without any break. In these circumstances, the period spent by them on temporary basis has been taken into consideration for the purpose of seniority.
It is not in dispute that the plaintiff-respondents have continued to serve the Nigam without any break in their service, whatsoever. Thus, when right from the initial appointment, the services of the plaintiffs were taken into consideration and the aforesaid period of temporary service was also taken into consideration for regularizing their service, then, the claim made by them could not be contested by the Nigam.
Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to the record.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law arises in the present appeal.
January 24, 2006 ( VINEY MITTAL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.