Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

YASH PAL & ANR versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Yash Pal & Anr v. State of Punjab - CRM-8729-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 543 (3 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.M.No.8729 M of 2006

Date of decision:21.2.2006

Yash Pal and another v. State of Punjab

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present: Mr. Yaswinder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Adv.

Ms.Reeta Kohli, DAG,Pb.

ORDER:

Heard.

Offences alleged against the petitioners are under sections 406/419/420/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC.

Case of the prosecution is that Baljinder Kaur purchased the property from Rajinder Kumar. The agreement to sell was attested by petitioner No.1 Yash Pal ,who is said to be a property dealer.

It is alleged that Rajinder Kumar did not disclose that he had already taken a loan for the said property from the ICICI bank and, thus, the complainant was cheated. The petitioner being identifier on the power of attorney in favour of Amita Rani, who executed the agreement in favour of the complainant, facilitated the cheating.

On 14.2.2006, following order was passed:- "Dismissed as not pressed qua petition No.1.

Notice of motion qua petition No.2 to A.G.Punjab for 21.2.2006."

Learned counsel for petitioner No.2 Veer Mati submits that petitioner No.2 being a lady and anticipatory bail of her husband having been rejected, investigation will not be hampered if she is granted anticipatory bail. It is submitted that she will join investigation and face proceedings in accordance with law.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case and without expressing any final opinion on the merits of the case, petitioner No. 2 Veer Mati, is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioner will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that the petitioner will not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; she will not interfere with the prosecution evidence directly or indirectly; she will not leave the country without the previous permission of the court; she will associate with the investigation as and when called by the police and that she will surrender the passport, if any.

The petition is disposed of.

February 21, 2006 (Adarsh Kumar Goel)

'gs' Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.