SURESH DHAWAN versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Suresh Dhawan v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-7336-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 5573 (17 August 2006)

C.W.P. No.7363 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN AT CHANDIGRH

C.W.P.No. 7336 of 2006

Date of decision: May 12,2006

Suresh Dhawan V. State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

Present: Mr. Salil Sagar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral)

Notice of motion to the respondents.

Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General,Haryana, who is present in the court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents on the asking of the Court.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we find that the primary grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has not been heard before the action of sealing has been done by respondents No.2 and 3.

Another grievance is that even a show cause notice was not issued to the petitioner.

Consequently, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before Senior Town Planner-cum- Chairman Building Composition Committee,respondent No.3, within a period of one week from the date a certified copy of this order is received. In the aforesaid representation, the petitioner shall give all the necessary details and annex all documents which are relevant for C.W.P. No.7363 of 2006 2

adjudication of the aforesaid claim. On receipt of the aforesaid representation, respondent No.3 shall consider the same and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner shall pass a detailed speaking order within a period of two weeks therefrom. If any adverse adverse to the petitioner is passed, then the petitioner would be entitled to seek his remedy before the Tribunal constituted under section 12(c) of the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act,1963.

A copy of this order be given dasti on usual charges.

( Viney Mittal )

Judge

May 12,2006 ( H.S.Bhalla )

sks Judge

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.