High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Net Ram Jain v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-8059-2004  RD-P&H 5577 (17 August 2006)
CWP NO.8059 of 2004
DATE OF DECISION: August 22,2006
Net Ram Jain
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA
PRESENT: Shri Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Aman Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondents.
The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to provide basic amenities in the residential Sector 1, Phase I & II, Narnaul. According to the petitioner, the aforesaid basic amenities have not been provided so far.
The claim made by the petitioner has been contested by the respondents. In the written statement filed by respondents No.2 to 4, it has been maintained that all the basic amenities have already been provided by the authorities and the aforesaid plea has been merely taken as an excuse to avoid the payment of instalments by the petitioner.
After going through the pleas raised by the petitioner and the stand taken by the respondents and in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Municipal Corporation Chandigarh & Ors.
Etc. v. M/s Shantikunj Investment Pvt. Ltd. Etc. JT 2006(3) SC 1, we are satisfied that the grievance made by the petitioner is wholly unjustified.
August 22, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.