Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHANTI DAHIYA versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shanti Dahiya v. Haryana Urban Development Authority and - CWP-13182-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 5622 (18 August 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.13182 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: August 22, 2006

Shanti Dahiya

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri S.K.Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, on the asking of the Court.

The grievance made by the petitioner is that an application filed by her for the allotment of plot under the oustee's quota has been rejected only on the ground that along with the application, earnest money had not been deposited by the petitioner.

However, from the perusal of the averments made in the present petition, we find that at no point of time the price of the plot had been fixed. In these circumstances, the petitioner obviously could not be expected to deposit any earnest money.

Consequently, we dispose of the present petition and it is directed that the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Sonepat shall reconsider the claim of the petitioner. If the petitioner is required to deposit any earnest money, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner and thereafter, her claim shall be considered in accordance with law.

The necessary process in this regard shall be completed by the Estate Officer, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

August 22, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.