Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHUJ BALBIR SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bhuj Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr - CWP-13242-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 5631 (18 August 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.13242 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: August 24, 2006

Bhuj Balbir Singh

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab and another

` .....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri S.S.Salar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1.

Shri B.S.Taunque, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of direction to respondent Improvement Trust, Ludhiana to intimate the due amount to the petitioner and allow him to deposit the price of the plot with a further direction to deliver the physical possession and execute the sale deed etc.

From the perusal of the record, we find that a representation (Annexure P.4) dated June 1, 2006 has been sent by the petitioner which remains unresponded so far.

In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation (Annexure P.4) within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

August 24,2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.