Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GIYASSU RAM versus SURESH & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


GIYASSU RAM v. SURESH & Ors - CRM-25392-M-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 573 (6 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 25392-M OF 2004

DATE OF DECISION: 17.2.2006

GIYASSU RAM

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

SURESH AND OTHERS

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Rakesh Gupta, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate,

for respondents No.1 and 2.

-----

ORDER:

Counsel for both the parties agree that the complaint pending at Guhla may be transferred at Pehowa, where the first complaint is pending.

Ordered accordingly.

February 17, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.