Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VED PARKASH & ANR. versus THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ved Parkash & anr. v. The State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-6598-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 5788 (22 August 2006)

C.W.P NO. 6598 OF 2005 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

* * * * *

C.W.P NO. 6598 OF 2005

Date of decision : August 3, 2006

* * * * *

Ved Parkash & anr. ............Petitioners Vs.

The State of Haryana & others ...........Respondents * * * * *

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA

Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Jatinder Dhanda, Advocate for respondents no. 2 to 5.

* * * * *

Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)

The petitioners have approached this Court for the issuance of directions to the respondents to extend the amenity of road AB as shown in the site plan (Annexure P-2) to the petitioners and other allottees of the complex constructed by M/s Hare Krishna Builders Private Limited.

Written statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents so far. From the perusal of the record, we find that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners have issued a notice dated January 24, 2005 (Annexure P-3) for demand of justice, which remains unresponded so far.

C.W.P NO. 6598 OF 2005 2

In these circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, we dispose of the present petition with a request to the Commissioner and Secretary, Government of Haryana, Urban Estates Department, Civil Secretariat, Haryana, Chandigarh-respondent no.1 to take a final decision on the aforesaid notice Annexure P-3 within a period of 4 months from the date a certified copy of this order is received by them by passing a detailed and speaking order.

Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.

( VINEY MITTAL )

JUDGE

August 3, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA )

ritu JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.