High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Ved Parkash & anr. v. The State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-6598-2005  RD-P&H 5788 (22 August 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
* * * * *
C.W.P NO. 6598 OF 2005
Date of decision : August 3, 2006
* * * * *
Ved Parkash & anr. ............Petitioners Vs.
The State of Haryana & others ...........Respondents * * * * *
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA
Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Jatinder Dhanda, Advocate for respondents no. 2 to 5.
* * * * *
Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)
The petitioners have approached this Court for the issuance of directions to the respondents to extend the amenity of road AB as shown in the site plan (Annexure P-2) to the petitioners and other allottees of the complex constructed by M/s Hare Krishna Builders Private Limited.
Written statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents so far. From the perusal of the record, we find that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners have issued a notice dated January 24, 2005 (Annexure P-3) for demand of justice, which remains unresponded so far.
C.W.P NO. 6598 OF 2005 2
In these circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, we dispose of the present petition with a request to the Commissioner and Secretary, Government of Haryana, Urban Estates Department, Civil Secretariat, Haryana, Chandigarh-respondent no.1 to take a final decision on the aforesaid notice Annexure P-3 within a period of 4 months from the date a certified copy of this order is received by them by passing a detailed and speaking order.
Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.
( VINEY MITTAL )
August 3, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.