High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Dhanattar Singh v. Kesar Singh - RSA-1529-2004  RD-P&H 610 (7 February 2006)
Case No. : R.S.A.No.1529 of 2004
Date of Decision : January 24, 2006.
Dhanattar Singh .... Appellant
Kesar Singh .... Respondent
Coram : Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal.
* * *
Present : Mr.J.C.Nagpal, Advocate
for the appellant.
for the respondent.
The plaintiff having concurrently lost before the two courts below, has approached this Court through the present appeal.
A suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from interfering in the possession of plaintiff, was dismissed by the trial court and his appeal also failed before the learned first appellate court.
Both the courts below have concurrently held that the plaintiff had failed to prove the over all exclusive possession of the suit property.
When the plaintiff has himself claimed that he was only co- sharer along with the defendant, then the appropriate remedy for him is to seek partition of the suit land. Once he has been shown as a co-sharer, his claim has rightly been rejected by the two courts below.
Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to the record.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law arises in the present appeal.
January 24, 2006 ( VINEY MITTAL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.