Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MADAN LAL versus M.P.SINGH & ANR.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Madan Lal v. M.P.Singh & anr. - COCP-754-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6412 (1 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.O.C.P. No.754 of 2006

Date of Decision:- 12.09.2006

Madan Lal ....Petitioner

through

Mr.Ranjit Sharma, Advocate

vs.

M.P.Singh & anr. ....Respondents

through

Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab

Mr.Sumeet Malhotra, Advocate

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
***

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner filed C.W.P.No.5861 of 2004 which was disposed of on April 6. 2004 with liberty to him to file representation before the Competent Authority within 15 days and the same was required to be decided by the Competent Authority within three months thereafter.

Alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid order, this contempt petition has been filed.

In response to the show cause notice, an affidavit has been filed by Mr.Rajesh Khokhar, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Tarn Taran.

Along with the said affidavit, he has appended an order dated 18.6.2004 (Annexure R-2/1) which was passed on the representation made by the petitioner and in terms whereof the petitioner's representation has been decided.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the said order was duly communicated to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, disputes its receipt.

Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the directions issued by this Court have been complied with and the petitioner's claim has been considered by passing a speaking order, no further action is called for and this petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the above-stated speaking order before an appropriate forum, if so advised.

Rule discharged.

September 12, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.