Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMESH KUMAR versus VIKRANT

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ramesh Kumar v. Vikrant - CRM-1590-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6551 (5 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 1590-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 15.09.2006

Ramesh Kumar

.... PETITIONER

Versus

Vikrant

..... RESPONDENT

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate,

for the respondent.

* * *

Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the compromise between the parties, the petitioner does not want to press this petition for quashing the summoning order passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar in criminal complaint No. 753/2/2004.

Dismissed as not pressed.

September 15, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.