Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S. MODERN WOOLENS LIMITED & ORS versus AMIT GUPTA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/s. Modern Woolens Limited & Ors v. Amit Gupta - CRM-50867-M-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 6688 (7 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRL.MISC.NO.50867-M OF 2005

DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 15, 2006

M/s. Modern Woolens Limited and others

....PETITITIONERS

VERSUS

Amit Gupta ....RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

None for the respondent.

...

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Sections 205 and 317Cr.P.C for quashing the order dated 29.8.2005 (Annexure P-7) passed by the JMIC, Ludhiana and granting exemption from appearance to the petitioners in a complaint titled "Amit Gupta vs. Rajesh Ranka etc." under Sections 406/120-B IPC pending the court of JMIC, Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the changed circumstances, i.e., compromise between the parties, the petitioners do not want to press this petition.

Dismissed as not pressed.

September 15, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.