Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KHARAITI LAL HANDA & ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kharaiti Lal Handa & Anr. v. State of Punjab - CRM-38216-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6782 (8 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.38216-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:31.8.2006

Kharaiti Lal Handa & Anr. ..........Petitioners Versus

State of Punjab ..........Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- Shri H.S. Gill, Sr. Advocate with Shri R.K. Dhiman, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Shri N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab.

Shri Gourave Bhayya, Advocate

for the complainant.

****

Petitioners Kharaiti Lal Handa and Narinder Kaur apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 188 dated 16.6.2006 under Sections 498-A/323/506 IPC, registered at Police Station City Abohar, District Ferozepur have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners, who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant in view of the interim order dated 13.7.2006, have joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State Counsel. Husband of the complainant has already been arrested and has been released on regular bail.

In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 6.7.2006 is made absolute.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

August 31, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.