Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ISHWAR SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ishwar Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-14938-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6847 (8 September 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 14938 of 2006

Date of Decision: September 18, 2006

Ishwar Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of direction to the respondents to release pensionary benefits of the petitioner along with interest @ 18% per annum. The petitioner has approached this Court without first approaching the respondents by filing a representation seeking enforcement of his legal rights. It has been asserted that the petitioner has retired from service w.e.f. 10.10.2005, vide order dated 10.8.2005. The file concerning his pension case is being sent forward and backward with one query or the other. However, at this stage without going into the merits of the controversy raised, we direct the Registry to sent five copies of the complete paper book of the writ CWP No. 14938 of 2006

petition along with copy of this order to the respondents who shall treat the same as a representation on behalf of the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner shall deposit the process fee along with copies of the petition within one week from today. The respondents shall take a final decision on the grievance made by the petitioner in the instant petition within a period of two months from the date of its receipt. If the pecuniary benefits/pensionary benefits are found due, the same shall be released expeditiously to the petitioner without any delay along with permissible rate of interest.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

September 18, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.