Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

N.A. versus N.A.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


n.a. v. n.a. - CRM-57668-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6921 (11 September 2006)

Criminal Misc. Nos. 57668 and 57669 of 2006 in CRA No. 300-DB of 2004

Present:- Mr. Sukhraj Singh Brar, Advocate for applicant-appellant.


Crl. Misc. No. 57669 of 2006

Criminal Misc. application is allowed.

Crl. Misc. No.57668 of 2006

Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant states that the alleged recovery from the appellant is three bags of poppy husk weighing 40 Kgs. each.

Appellant has undergone more than five years of actual sentence.

Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant states that he wants to withdraw the application for suspension of sentence.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Crl. Appeal No.300-DB of 2004

Registry is directed to post the appeal for arguments within three months.




September 21, 2006 JUDGE



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.