Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. KAMLA & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Kamla & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - RA-221-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6979 (12 September 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

RA No. 221 of 2006

In CWP No. 16325 of 2005

Date of decision: 31.8.2006

Smt. Kamla and others

...Applicant-Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Sangwan, Advocate,

for the applicant-petitioners.

Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana,

for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

Notice of the application.

Mr. Harish Rathee, learned State counsel, who is present in the Court accepts notice.

After hearing the arguments, we recall our order dated 25.7.2006 and pass the following order:- In view of the stand taken by the respondents in para Nos. 6 to 8 of the written statement, the writ petition is stated to have become infructuous.

Ordered accordingly.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

FAO No. 757 of 1987

August 31, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.