High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Chander Devi v. Mukat Singh - RSA-5188-2003  RD-P&H 719 (10 February 2006)
Case No. : R.S.A.No. 5188 of 2003
Date of Decision : January 23, 2006.
Chander Devi .... Appellant
Mukat Singh .... Respondent
Coram : Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal.
* * *
Present : Mr.D.S.Malik, Advocate
for the appellant.
for the respondent.
The plaintiff having concurrently lost before the two courts below, has approached this court through the present appeal.
The suit for possession filed by the plaintiff being the owner of the suit land was decreed by the learned trial court and appeal filed by the defendant was dismissed by the first appellate court. The defendant had taken up the plea of adverse possession. It was held that in the earlier suit also, he had taken uo the similar plea but was not accepted. Even in this case, the defendant failed to lead any such evidence which could show that he was in adverse possession.
In these circumstances, the findings recorded by both the courts below cannot be said to be erroneous in any manner.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law arises in the present appeal.
January 23, 2006 ( VINEY MITTAL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.