Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ISHAR SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ishar Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-15108-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 7213 (14 September 2006)

CWP NO. 15108 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO. 15108 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 21.9.2006

Ishar Singh ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND

PRESENT: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner claims pension and other retiral benefits which became payable to the petitioner on his retirement on attaining the age of superannuation. In this behalf, it is pointed out that the petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.1.2006. He thereafter addressed a legal notice to the respondents dated 2.6.2006 (Annexure P4). It is, however, pointed out that no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 i.e. the District Food Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs Controller, Mansa, requiring him to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 2.6.2006 (Annexure P4).

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

CWP NO. 15108 of 2006 2

Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondent No.3 i.e. the District Food Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs Controller, Mansa, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 2.6.2006 (Annexure P4), by passing a well reasoned speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to him within a further period of one month.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti, on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( S.D. Anand )

September 21, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.