High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Satish Kumar & Ors v. Gram Panchayat, Kabri & Ors - RSA-2781-2002  RD-P&H 729 (14 February 2006)
Case No. : R.S.A.No.2781 of 2002
Date of Decision : February 02, 2006.
Satish Kumar and others .... Appellants
Gram Panchayat, Kabri and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr.Justice Viney Mittal.
* * *
Present : Mr.S.K.S.Bedi, Advocate
for the appellants.
A suit filed by the plaintiffs for permanent injunction was decreed by the learned trial court and it was directed that they shall not be dispossessed from the suit property except in due course of law. The appeal filed by the defendants also failed before the learned first appellate court and similar relief was granted by the said court.
The only argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that the findings recorded by the two courts below, on question of title are wholly irrelevant and could not be recorded by the two courts below.
I am afraid that the said contention of the learned counsel is without any basis. Once the plaintiff chose to raise a question of title, then the said question was bound to be decided by the trial court as well as the trial court.
Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to the record.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal.
February 02, 2006 ( VINEY MITTAL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.