Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM PHAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Phal v. State of Haryana and Ors - CWP-14990-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 7334 (15 September 2006)

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.

C.W.P.No. 14990 of 2006

Decided on: Sept 25,2006

Ram Phal --Petitioner

vs.

State of Haryana and Ors --Respondents

Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Pritam Pal

Present: Mr R.D.Yadav,Advocate,for the petitioner Jasbir Singh J:(Oral)

In this writ petition, it is grievance of the petitioner that despite allotment of plot made in his favour in the year 1994, possession thereof, has not been handed over to him.

During arguments, it transpires that petitioner had already sent a legal notice Annexure P-2, to the authority concerned for the relief,which he is claiming in this writ petition.

This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Rewari, to look into grievance of the petitioner and decide the legal notice Annexure P-2, as per law. Opportunity of hearing be given to the parties concerned before passing the order.

(Jasbir Singh)

Judge

Sept 25,2006, (Pritam Pal)

RR Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.