Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. DARSHAN KAUR versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Darshan Kaur v. State of Haryana - CRM-42425-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 7414 (19 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 42425-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 25.09.2006

Smt. Darshan Kaur

.... PETITIONERS

Versus

State of Haryana

..... RESPONDENT

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Partap Singh, Senior DAG, Haryana.

The petitioner, apprehending her arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 75 dated 6.3.2006 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra,, has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of anticipatory bail.

I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of the FIR as well as the order dated 10.6.2006, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, whereby bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed.

In this case, on July 31, 2006, after hearing counsel for both the parties, the interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to her joining investigation.

Counsel for the petitioner states that in terms of the aforesaid interim order dated July 31, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

The State counsel does not dispute this fact and further states that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation.

In view of the aforesaid facts, without commenting on the merits of the case, the interim bail, granted vide order dated July 31, 2006, is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioner shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

September 25, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.