High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
Jagdish Singh v. Usha Sharma - CR-3445-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 754 (14 February 2006)
Civil Revision No.3445 of 2005
Date of Decision: 20.02.2006
Parties Name
Jagdish Singh
Petitioner
versus
Usha Sharma
Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate for the petitioner
Shri V.B.Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent
JUDGMENT
By stating that during pendency of the suit, respondent has encroached upon some portion of the land, in dispute, petitioner moved one application for amendment of his plaint. The same was dismissed. The Court below, while dismissing his application, has opined that the fact, which the petitioner now intended to incorporate in his plaint, was very much within his knowledge. Application of the petitioner, for amendment, was read in Court, in the same, no date has been mentioned, on which, illegal possession was taken by the opposite party. It is apparent from records that in her written statement, respondent has specifically stated that she was in possession and had raised construction over the property. Under these circumstances, this Court feels that the order passed is perfectly justified and needs no interference.
Dismissed.
February 20, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )
gk Judge
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.