Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

OMPARKASH SON OF BHAI RAM versus OMPARKASH SON OF RAMCHARANDASS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Omparkash son of Bhai Ram v. Omparkash son of Ramcharandass - RSA-4528-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 759 (14 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No.4528 of 2005

Date of Decision: 23.02.2006

Parties Name

Omparkash son of Bhai Ram

Appellant

versus

Omparkash son of Ramcharandass

Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the appellant JUDGMENT

Respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for possession of the shop, in dispute. He further prayed that the appellant-defendant be directed to pay mesne profits for use and occupation of the said shop. During pendency of suit, possession of the shop, in dispute, was delivered, under orders of the Court, to respondent on 16.3.1999. Suit was decreed to the extent granting mesne profits @ Rs.700/- per month w.e.f. February, 1996 to 16.3.1999.

Appellant failed in appeal.

Before the Courts below and also before this Court, it was contention of the appellant that, in fact, possession was delivered by the appellant, of his own, to the respondent on 27.2.1996 and not on 16.3.1999, as has been determined by both the Courts below. By taking note of the evidence on record, Courts below have rightly held that the possession, in fact, was got delivered by the bailiff to the respondent on 16.3.1999. To say so, reliance has been placed upon report made by the bailiff Ex.P12 and Ex.P13. This Court feels that in view of findings given by the appellate Court in paragraph Nos.12 to 16, no case is made out for interference in pure findings of fact as counsel has failed to raise any substantial question of law at the time of arguments.

Dismissed.

February 23, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.