Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RANJIT SINGH versus IBRAHIM & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ranjit Singh v. Ibrahim & Ors - RSA-995-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 775 (15 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No.995 of 2004(O&M)

Date of Decision: 7.02.2006

Parties Name

Ranjit Singh

Appellant

versus

Ibrahim and others

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate for the appellant Shri Rajan Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2 Shri M.C.Beri, Sr.DAG Punjab

JUDGMENT

C.M. No.2461-C of 2004

In view of averments made in application, which is accompanied by an affidavit, it is allowed and one day delay in filing the appeal stands condoned.

RSA No.995 of 2004

Appellant alongwith respondent Nos.13 and 14 filed a suit for possession of land, measuring 5 marlas, description of which was given in their plaint. It was further prayed that respondent Nos.1 to 12 be restrained from raising any construction over the said property. Their suit was dismissed. Appeal filed by the appellant and respondent No.l4 also failed.

Both the Courts below have found it as a matter of fact that in between land of the appellant, which is in dispute, there existed circular road of the village and as such, there is no question of the respondents, referred to above, to encroach upon land of the appellant as alleged. It has further been noticed that even as per case of the appellant, the circular road does not pass through his property. The demarcation report, upon which, reliance was placed by the appellant, has been discarded by the Courts below, having been made against the rules and in absence of the respondents. No substantial question of law has been raised at the time of arguments, as such, no case is made out for interference.

Dismissed.

February 7, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.