High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala v. M/s Groz Backert Asia Limited, Chandigar - ITA-266-2003  RD-P&H 7952 (28 September 2006)
ITA No.266 of 2003
Date of decision:12.10.2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
M/s Groz Backert Asia Limited, Chandigarh ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Dr. N.L.Sharda, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms.Radhika Suri, Advocate, for the respondent.
1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'A', Chandigarh (in short, 'the ITAT') dated 13.5.2003 in ITA No.99/Chandi/96, in respect of assessment year 1992-93, proposing following substantial questions of law:-
"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in holding that the expenditure incurred on foreign travelling was a revenue expenditure?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in holding that the value of the finished goods in the closing stock would not include Central Excise Duty
2. In view of our judgment rendered today in ITA No.2 of 2004 (The Commissioner of Income tax, Patiala v. M/s Groz Backert Asia Limited Chandigarh), this appeal is also dismissed.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel)
October 12, 2006 (Rajesh Bindal)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.