Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAM LAL versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHAM LAL v. State of Punjab and Ors. - CRM-7864-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 796 (15 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 7864-M OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 24.2.2006

SHAM LAL

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB

...RESPONDENT

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Mohd. Salim, Advocate for

Mr Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Ms Reeta Kohli, DAG, Punjab.

-----

ORDER:

This order will dispose of Criminal Misc. Nos.7864-M and 9008-M of 2006.

Heard.

Offence alleged is under sections 376/364/365/366-A/344/218/ 506/509 IPC, section 25 of the Arms Act and sections 8/9/13 of P.C. Act.

It is not disputed that cases of petitioners Sham Lal and Gurbachan Singh are at par with Ramgir co-accused, who has been granted bail vide order dated 9.2.2006 in Criminal Misc. No.341-M of 2006.

In view of above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioners are granted bail to the satisfaction of CJM/ Duty Magistrate, Ropar.

The petitions are disposed of.

February 24, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.