Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

H.S. DHILLON versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


H.S. Dhillon v. State of Haryana & Anr - CWP-15633-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8097 (29 September 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 15633 of 2006

Date of Decision: September 28, 2006

H.S. Dhillon

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

The petitioner, who is working as a Lecturer Physical Education in Sri Krishna Government Ayurvedic College, Kurukshetra, in the pay scale of Rs. 12000-18300, has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to declare his post as Class-I (Group-A), keeping in view the recommendation made by the Principal of the aforementioned College, especially in view of the fact that in all the Departments of the State of Haryana, the post carrying the pay scale of Rs. 12000-18300 is considered as a Class-I post, whereas the post of the petitioner is being treated as Class-III. It CWP No. 15633 of 2006

is appropriate to mention that the petitioner has already represented to the respondents number of times vide representations dated 2.7.2001, 17.8.2005 and 18.5.2006 (P-6, P-8 and P-9 respectively).

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the aforementioned representations of the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

September 28, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.