High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
Gurbachan Singh v. HUDA & another - CWP-14864-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8198 (9 October 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
* * * * *
C.W.P NO. 14864 OF 2006
Date of decision : September 15, 2006
* * * * *
Gurbachan Singh & ors. ............Petitioners Vs.
HUDA & another ...........Respondents
* * * * *
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA
Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
* * * * *
Viney Mittal, J. (Oral)
Notice of motion to the respondents.
On the asking of the Court, Sh. Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Copy of the writ petition be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
The petitioners claims themselves to be oustees and as such claim that they are entitled to the allotment of plots under the oustees quota.
It has also been averred by the counsel for the petitioners that an application dated March 23, 1998 has been filed by the petitioners for allotment of plots under the oustees quota but no action whatsoever has been taken on it so far. The petitioners, thereafter filed a representation Annexure P-13, which remains unresponded so far.
C.W.P NO. 14864 OF 2006 2
In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Estate Officer, HUDA, Panipat to decide the aforesaid representation within a period of 3 months from the date a certified copy of this order is received by passing a detailed and speaking order.
Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.
( VINEY MITTAL )
JUDGE
September 15, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA )
ritu JUDGE
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.