Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHIVRAJ BANSAL versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shivraj Bansal v. State of Haryana - CRM-49455-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8329 (10 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.49455-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:16.10.2006

Shivraj Bansal ..........Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..........Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- Shri J.S. Bedi, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Shri M.S. Sindhu, DAG, Haryana.

****

Petitioner Shivraj Bansal apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No. 185 dated 6.7.2006 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Ambala Cantt has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as a person who has received the amount.

Actually, he himself is a victim at the hands of P.S. Sandhu, who is the main accused in this case and has cheated him also. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in terms of the interim order dated 22.8.2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 22.8.2006 is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioner shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

October 16, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.