Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

J.P. NAULA & ORS versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


J.P. Naula & Ors v. State of Punjab & Ors - CRM-64680-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8385 (12 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 64680-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 19.10.2006

J.P. Naula and others

.... PETITIONERS

Versus

State of Punjab and others

..... RESPONDENTS

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

* * *

The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence, have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of anticipatory bail.

I have heard counsel for the petitioners and gone through the contents of the petition.

Till date, no case has been registered against the petitioners. In my opinion, apprehension of arrest of the petitioners at this stage is totally mis-conceived.

Dismissed.

October 19, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.