Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURAJ KUMAR RODEY versus HARYANA TOURISM CORPORATION LIMITED AND

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Suraj Kumar Rodey v. Haryana Tourism Corporation Limited and - CWP-3929-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 8391 (12 October 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

CWP No. 3929 of 2004

Date of Decision: October 16, 2006

Suraj Kumar Rodey

...Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Tourism Corporation Limited and another ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. Ram Kumar Malik, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate,

for respondent No. 1.

Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Advocate,

for respondent No. 2.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 has raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition is not maintainable for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 23.2.2004 (P-7), inasmuch as, it has been passed by a Court of competent jurisdiction, merely on the ground that the petitioner was not a party to the aforementioned suit. In support of his submission, learned counsel has placed reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in CWP No. 3929 of 2004

the case of Smt. Jatan Kanwar Golcha v. Golcha Properties Pvt.

Ltd., AIR 1971 SC 374, as followed by the Orissa High Court in the case of Abdul Rasid Khan v. Sk. Rahimtulla, AIR 1979 Orissa 175.

Faced with the aforementioned objection, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before a competent Court of jurisdiction against the judgment and decree dated 23.2.2004 passed in Civil Suit No. 22 of 2003 (P-7).

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. If the appeal is found to be beyond the period of limitation then the petitioner may file an appropriate application in accordance with law, which shall be considered and disposed of accordingly.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

October 16, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.