Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PUSHPA DEVI versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Pushpa Devi v. State of Haryana & Anr - CWP-16444-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8410 (12 October 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

CWP No. 16444 of 2006

Date of Decision: October 17, 2006

Pushpa Devi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. A.K. Goyat, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 26.7.2006 (P-14) transferring the petitioner from Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Jind to Government Girls Senior Secondary School Baroda, where the curriculum of Scouting does not exist. It has been asserted that the impugned order has been passed in violation of the instructions/policies dated 22.4.1997, 16.3.2001, 6.10.2004 and 9.7.2006 (P-11, P-12, P-15 and P-16 respectively). A further prayer has been made for directing respondent No. 2 to decide CWP No. 16444 of 2006

representation dated 5.10.2006 (P-18) and to cancel the transfer of the petitioner. The petitioner has also placed reliance on the judgment of this Court passed in C.W.P. No. 16739 of 2004, decided on 29.10.2004 (P-17), which was earlier filed by the petitioner.

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct respondent No. 2 to take cognizance of the representation dated 5.10.2006 (P-18) sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is presented. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

October 17, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.