Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. KUSUM LATA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Kusum Lata v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-16588-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8494 (12 October 2006)

C.W.P. No. 16588 of 2006 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 16588 of 2006

Date of Decision: October 19, 2006

Smt. Kusum Lata

.....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate

for the petitioner.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in the writ petition is for issuance of direction to the respondent Department to forward the application of the petitioner for appointment as Care Taker Associate N.C.C. Officer to the Commanding Officer, 15rh Haryana Battalion NCC, Jind (respondent No.5) keeping in view the relevant provisions of National Cadet Cores (Girls Division) Rules, 1949, with a further direction to allow the petitioner to take training C.W.P. No. 16588 of 2006 [2]

for becoming a NCC Officer as she fulfils all the requisite eligibility conditions/ qualifications for appointment as Care Taker Associate NCC Officer under Rule 13 of the aforesaid Rules.

For the aforementioned relief claimed in the present writ petition, the petitioner has already represented to the respondents vide representation dated 30.8.2006 (P-3).

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representation sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be meritorious and decided in her favour then the benefit accruing to the petitioner shall be given within a further period of two months thereafter. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

October 19, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.