Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUBHASH CHAND versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Subhash Chand v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-16636-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8499 (12 October 2006)

C.W.P. No. 16636 of 2006 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 16636 of 2006

Date of Decision: October 19, 2006

Subhash Chand

.....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr.S.P. Laler, Advocate

for the petitioner.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in the writ petition is to quash the order of transfer dated 20.7.2006 (P-2) qua the petitioner and order dated 1.9.2006 (P-4) of private respondent qua her and further to prohibit respondents from transferring the petitioner from G.S.S.S. Adhoya and direct the respondents to retain the petitioner in G.S.S.S. Adhoya, District Ambala, in view of couple case and in view of violation of transfer policy of rationalization.

C.W.P. No. 16636 of 2006 [2]

For the aforementioned relief claimed in the present writ petition, the petitioner has already represented to the respondents vide representations dated 20.9.2006 and 6.10.2006 (P-7 and P-8).

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representations sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be meritorious and decided in her favour then the benefit accruing to the petitioners shall be given within a further period of two months thereafter. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

October 19, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.