Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATNAM versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SATNAM v. STATE OF HARYANA - CRM-70808-M-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 850 (16 February 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 70808-M OF 2005

DATE OF DECISION: 28.2.2006

SATNAM

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

...RESPONDENT

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr S.S. Kharab, AAG, Haryana.

-----

ORDER:

Heard.

Offence alleged is under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Alleged recovery from the petitioner is 20 kilograms of poppy husk.

It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody for the last about four months; investigation is complete; trial will take time; the petitioner is not a previous convict and is not likely to abscond or misuse the concession of bail and the recovery is not commercial.

Without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioner is granted bail to the satisfaction of CJM/ Duty Magistrate, Rewari.

The petition is disposed of.

February 28, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.