Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GULSHAN KUMAR & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gulshan Kumar & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-16650-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8500 (12 October 2006)

C.W.P. No. 16650 of 2006 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 16650 of 2006

Date of Decision: October 19, 2006

Gulshan Kumar and others

.....Petitioners

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. R.C. Chatrath, Advocate

for the petitioners.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in the writ petition is for issuance of direction to the respondents to consider and grant one grade increment to the petitioners on their promotion from the post of Multi-purpose Health Workers to the posts of Multi-purpose Health Supervisors as provided under Rule 4.4 (a) (i) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Volume I Part 1 (as applicable to the State of Haryana) as well as the law laid down by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

C.W.P. No. 16650 of 2006 [2]

For the aforementioned relief claimed in the present writ petition, the petitioners have already got served a legal notice dated 11.4.2006 (P-7), upon the respondents.

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice sent by the petitioners and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. If the claim of the petitioners is found to be meritorious and decided in their favour then the benefit accruing to the petitioners shall be given within a further period of two months thereafter. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

October 19, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.