High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
RAJIV KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA - CRM-9694-M-2006  RD-P&H 853 (16 February 2006)
CRL. MISC. NO. 9694-M OF 2006
DATE OF DECISION: 28.2.2006
STATE OF HARYANA
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Krishan Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr S.S. Kharab, AAG, Haryana.
Mr R.S. Budhwar, Advocate
Offence alleged is under sections 148/149/324/506 IPC.
The petitioner is attributed a simple injury and four other co- accused have been arrested and released on bail.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to cooperate with the investigation and join investigation and will not misuse the concession of anticipatory bail and arrest of the petitioner is not called for at this stage.
Without expressing any final opinion on merits, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioner will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.
In the event of arrest, the petitioner will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that the petitioner will not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; he will not interfere with the prosecution evidence directly or indirectly; he will not leave the country without the previous permission of the court; he will associate with the investigation as and when called by the police and that he will surrender the passport, if any.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
February 28, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.